A group of 40 researchers, including Lankau, has raised concerns about the negative impact of computers on children’s development. These academics are petitioning to halt digitization in German schools and kindergartens for children aged 4-11. Despite the increasing integration of computers and tablets in education globally, the researchers argue for a moratorium based on their worries about the consequences of digital technologies on childhood development.
According to UN data, 46.7% of primary school classrooms worldwide have access to computers, with the figure soaring to 98% in the EU. The significance of technology in classrooms has been a growing trend, with proponents emphasizing its potential benefits for learning. However, this petition highlights a counterargument, suggesting that the potential drawbacks, as perceived by these researchers, warrant a pause on further digitization in German educational institutions catering to young children.
The researchers, affiliated with Germany’s “Gesellschaft für Bildung und Wissen” (Society for Education and Knowledge), are likely to influence the ongoing debate surrounding the appropriate role of technology in early childhood education. Their call for a moratorium underscores the need for a balanced and informed discussion on the integration of digital tools, considering the potential impact on children’s social, cognitive, and physical development.
Reevaluation of digital technology education:
The call for a reevaluation of digital technology education in German schools, as highlighted by the recent petition led by Lankau and other academics, aligns with a broader critique of the country’s perceived lag in digitalization within educational institutions. Rather than a blanket endorsement of increased technology integration, the focus of the petition is on prompting the German Ministry of Education to reconsider how technology is employed specifically in kindergartens and classrooms.
Lankau emphasizes a shift in educational priorities, expressing concerns that the current system neglects the essential learning and educational benefits of social skills. He advocates for an education system that places a central focus on the individual, allowing students to develop based on their unique interests and inclinations while also becoming integral parts of their social communities.
The criticism extends to the influence of IT and business associations, which, according to Lankau, have played a significant role in shaping educational practices for four decades. Instead of allowing external entities to dictate educational approaches, Lankau suggests a more localized and personalized approach. He encourages a fundamental question: What specific needs does each school have concerning staff and media technology? This perspective underscores the importance of tailoring educational strategies to the unique context and requirements of individual schools rather than adhering to broad, externally imposed standards.
Navigating the Evidence on Computers and Child Development:
The debate over the impact of computers on child development is complex, and opinions vary among experts. Maria Hatzigianni, an expert in early childhood education and digital technologies, dismisses Lankau’s concerns as part of a longstanding “anti-technology” trend, highlighting that similar worries have been raised since the 1990s with the advent of new technologies. She draws attention to historical instances, noting that even Socrates expressed concerns about the potential forgetfulness induced by writing almost 2,500 years ago.
Prakash Ranganathan, the Director for the Center for Cyber Security Research at the University of North Dakota, adds nuance to the discussion, stating that the scientific evidence regarding the effects of digital technologies on child development is mixed. Some studies suggest that overuse of computers can impact physical health, leading to sedentary behaviors associated with issues such as obesity, sleep disorders, and anxiety. These concerns often extend to broader fears about the influence of the internet and social media on young people.
“There is some evidence of effects on cognitive development — an inability to focus after computer over-use can lead to [a] passive learning experience which may hinder critical thinking and problem-solving skills. But it’s unclear if these potential negative impacts are short or long-lasting,” Ranganathan said DW.
However, Ranganathan emphasizes the need for more research to establish conclusive links between digital technology use and its potential negative effects on child development. The mixed nature of the scientific evidence suggests that while some concerns are valid, a comprehensive understanding requires further exploration of the specific dynamics at play, including the role of the internet and social media in shaping the experiences of children in the digital age.
Computers Positively Impact Child Development:
Prakash Ranganathan and Maria Hatzigianni underscore the positive impact of digital technology interventions on child development, emphasizing research findings that demonstrate enhanced literacy and numeracy skills, improved manual dexterity, and heightened visuospatial working memory when these technologies are incorporated into educational contexts. They point to studies indicating that children’s engagement with interactive digital tools contributes positively to language learning, executive function, and memory skills. This perspective highlights the potential of purposeful integration of digital technology in educational settings to support multifaceted aspects of child development, challenging the notion that technology inherently hampers children’s growth and suggesting a nuanced approach to its use in fostering essential skills.
“We have robotics, coding, language learning, functional literacy, maths. Technology is a tool to help us access information and learning to be creative. It helps hugely with metacognition,” stated Hatzigianni.
Key Role of Involving Children in Their Education:
Maria Hatzigianni has been collaborating with the Greek government in an effort to implement digital learning apps tailored for children in the 4-6 age group within kindergartens. Her work involves establishing adaptable learning platforms that actively engage children, teachers, and parents. According to Hatzigianni, these collaborative initiatives have proven to be the most successful, emphasizing the importance of involving all stakeholders in the development and implementation of digital tools for early childhood education. This approach aligns with the idea that inclusive, interactive learning environments can maximize the positive impact of digital technologies on children’s education and development.
“The right question should be: how are we going to use the right technology to enhance learning and improve teaching, not being scared of it,” stated Hatzigianni.
It’s important, said Hatzigianni, for educators to work with children to create healthy digital lives. She criticized the German group for ignoring the input from children: “It’s quite ironic that they say they want to teach more critical thinking and analysis in children, but then they take the choice away from children about their own digital education. Did they ever ask for children’s active input?”
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as a health advice. We would ask you to consult a qualified professional or medical expert to gain additional knowledge before you choose to consume any product or perform any exercise.
